This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2017, 8, 762–771, doi:10.3762/bjnano.8.79
Scheme 1: Au–DNA nanocomposite interactions with Mg2+, Ca2+ and Fe2+ ions.
Figure 1: Surface plasmon absorption band of (a) Au nanospheres and (b) Au nanorods before and after DNA modi...
Figure 2: Circular dichroism spectral changes in the DNA conformation upon binding with (a) Au nanospheres an...
Figure 3: TEM images of bare (a) AuNSs, (b) AuNRs, (c) AuNS–DNA and (d) AuNR–DNA nanocomposites.
Figure 4: Dynamic light scattering particle size distribution of bare and DNA modified (a,b) AuNS-1, (c,d) Au...
Figure 5: AFM images of (a,b) AuNS 1-DNA nanocomposites and (c,d) AuNR–DNA nanocomposites showing height and ...
Figure 6: 3D AFM images of Au–DNA nanocomposites of (a) AuNSs and (b) AuNRs.
Figure 7: Variation in zeta potential of AuNPs before and after DNA modification.
Figure 8: Fluorescence emission intensity of bare (a) AuNPs, (b) DNA and (c) AuNP–DNA composites.
Figure 9: Change in fluorescence intensity for a sample with (a) Fe2+ and Ca2+ ions and (b) Mg2+ ions, with a...
Figure 10: (a) Fluorescence intensity of Au–DNA nanocomposites with increasing concentration (ppm) of Mg2+ and...
Figure 11: Fluorescence emission of an aqueous solution of Mg2+ ions in Sample 1 (50 ppm), Sample 2 (150 ppm),...
Figure 12: Measured concentration of Mg2+ ions in real life samples. The error bars represent ±5% error.